The women’s movement actually favors men.  It may have changed the way women see themselves, but it certainly hasn’t changed what men are attracted to.  It’s pretty insidious…as the average age for marriage has jumped 5/6 years since 1970, so, too, has promiscuity, of which women are perennially the victims (I’m going to assume that those who disagree with this point were not psychology majors with steady streams of information to make such a bold claim)….part of what the women’s movement did was distract women by making them think they won something while masking their biological reality…as women push marriage off into the future, seeing it as a social, financial, and professional impracticality, they dismiss the fairy-tale standards once inculcated into their very being – that of a virginal wife – making it easier for guys to get into their pants.

But what do men want? Young women. Deep down? Preferably virgins. If I have to tell you that obviously this doesn’t apply to every man then please just stop reading – your brain is not ready to handle interesting ideas yet.  A woman is looking for stability and security from a man…women rate the same guy as more or less attractive depending on how the context reflects his status. (Surprise, women rate the same man as more attractive if he’s pictured in front of a nice car than a crappy car).  A man doesn’t care if you’re homeless.  If you’re hot, you’re hot…of course, no hot woman would be homeless because such a woman does not need value besides her looks to get a good number of men to take care of her. I am not making any judgments on women or men, just pointing out what is – I may feel entirely different from what I say men want, I’m just stating what is observable. What is observable is that women are making a trade between being appealing to men by being more “wifey” and having their own career. (Trying to do both seems to be a trade-off as well).  The same things that women want from men – the ability to provide security and stability – are not the things that will keep a man interested in a woman.  He doesn’t care about your degrees or your money; in fact, it might turn him off. Are you the type of woman a man wants to marry? To take home to mom? I’m not saying that women should reflect an image of what all men want, just the ones they want, if they want any at all.

People only feel like the sentiment of women having careers represents equality because they deem material, worldly things supreme; thus, if women have less power, money, or status than a man, she is inferior unless she can replicate those qualities. This is largely what our society promotes for women, and though I remain that both genders, or anything in between, not be bound to any arbitrary social norms, certain facts seem to exist, for example, how a baby learns its mothers voice from within the womb, the special chemical processes that babies from many species have specifically with their mothers – that regardless of culture, women communicate with their babies the same…in many ways that fathers do NOT. Naturally, men have their role as parents, but let’s stop with the politically correct BS and realize that men and women are different. Women have their special capacity and men have theirs…in general. So why can’t we encourage women to fulfill what is uniquely feminine, even if that IS staying at home if they choose to have kids, or if it IS to have an illustrious career…maybe women ARE better suited for the roles men currently occupy, but WHATEVER is uniquely feminine, why can’t such be venerated the same as the man who seeks to fulfill what is uniquely masculine?

To be bold, I see a society deprived of real men, and full of women who want to pee standing up.